Politics 3 min read By Callum Montgomery
Voters in most places rejected data centres at the ballot box, one North Dakota town did not
Voters across the country reportedly turned against data centres in the 2026 midterm elections, with one North Dakota community departing from the trend.
Voters across the United States reportedly rejected data centres at the ballot box during the 2026 midterm elections, according to a short report from Inc. by Sam Blum. The piece presents local opposition to the large computing facilities as a national pattern, with one North Dakota community standing out as an exception.
The report is brief, and the excerpt available describes the general pattern rather than the detail of individual contests. It does not set out vote counts, margins, or the specific ballot measures, candidates or local officials involved. Readers are therefore not given a full account of what was put to voters in each place or how decisively it was decided.
The North Dakota community is described as having voted differently from the rest of the country, but the available material does not say what its residents voted for or against. It also does not establish whether the result there reflected a particular project, a local economic argument, or a wider dispute over the facilities. Nor does the material name the town or state how many voters took part in the decision.
Data centres, which house the servers that power online services and, increasingly, artificial intelligence tools, have drawn attention in several parts of the country in recent years. The notes supplied for this article do not expand on the specific concerns raised in those debates, nor do they link the electoral outcomes to any particular set of grievances, so any such connection remains outside what can be confirmed here.
The Inc. piece is framed as a report on voter reactions rather than an analysis of the industry, and the supplied notes contain no direct quotations from voters, campaigners, company representatives or elected officials. Without those voices, the account rests on the reported summary of the national trend and the single contrasting case, and cannot test how widely the sentiment was shared or how it was expressed at the polls.
Further detail on the individual votes and the reasons voters gave would be needed to assess how far the reported rejection reflects local planning concerns and how far it reflects broader public sentiment about the industry. Until that material is available, the outcome in the North Dakota community stands as the clearest point of contrast in an otherwise one-directional account.
Source: inc.com
8
