Economy 4 min read By Arthur Ellington
Analyst urges US clean energy standard for AI data centres
A clean energy standard, rather than bans or cost rules alone, is the answer to surging power demand from AI data centres, argues a former climate adviser, as voters and states push back on the buildout.
A former climate adviser is calling on Washington to introduce a clean energy standard for the artificial intelligence data centres driving a fresh surge in electricity demand, arguing that bans and cost rules alone will not solve the problem. The case, set out in a Fortune opinion piece in November 2026, comes as voters increasingly treat the facilities as a political issue ahead of the midterm elections.
Public concern is already visible. An NBC exit poll found that 56 per cent of voters considered AI and data centres a crucial or major factor in their vote. Across the country, more than 40 local measures have passed that restrict the construction or operation of data centres, reflecting frustration over power use, land and the wider footprint of the industry.
The gas-fired buildout is at the centre of the debate. In Southaven, Mississippi, xAI runs gas turbines to power its Colossus 2 facility, and the site has prompted lawsuits and air-quality complaints from local residents. Global Energy Monitor counts 189 gigawatts of gas capacity tied to data centres in development, of which about 17 gigawatts is already under construction. Shortages and backlogs in turbine supply could delay or scrap some of those gas projects, although that uncertainty has not yet slowed the wider push.
Against that backdrop, the author points to a shift in the energy mix. The Energy Information Administration reports that solar, batteries and wind account for more than 90 per cent of planned US capacity additions. Developers are racing to qualify for federal tax credits before they are phased out, which has accelerated the pipeline of renewable projects. The author argues that a clean energy standard tied specifically to data centres would channel that momentum towards the new load rather than leaving it to fossil generation.
Federal action so far has been limited. The Trump administration's Ratepayer Protection Pledge is voluntary, and the Ratepayer Protection Act has stalled in the Senate, although it could return when the next Congress convenes. At state level, lawmakers have used moratoriums and rules on how the costs of grid upgrades are shared, but few of those measures are linked to clean power.
Other countries offer examples the author cites. Ireland now meets 80 per cent of annual demand from new renewables built domestically, and Singapore is powering 50 per cent of new capacity with green energy. Japan offers subsidies of up to 50 per cent of investment for fully decarbonised sites, while China has set a target of 80 per cent green power at its new main data hubs. Ireland's six-year compliance period is presented as a model for how a standard could be phased in.
Cost is a central part of the argument. BloombergNEF estimates that on-site gas generation for a 500-megawatt facility may exceed $140 per megawatt hour, a figure that buying power from the grid could largely avoid. The large technology companies are already moving in this direction: Amazon, Google, Meta and Microsoft signed about 80 per cent of corporate renewable contracts in 2025. The Energy Information Administration expects residential electricity prices to rise by nearly 5 per cent this year, which adds pressure on policymakers to show that new demand will not be passed on to households.
Some questions remain open. One is whether a clean energy standard would push investment abroad to less regulated markets. The author argues that this risk is smaller than it appears, but the point is likely to feature in the debate over how any such standard would be designed and enforced.
Source: fortune.com
5
