Culture 5 min read By Bethany Hadley
The Social Reckoning opens to $5m as Zuckerberg drama flops
Aaron Sorkin's follow-up to The Social Network took just $5 million in its opening weekend, a fraction of the 2010 film's $22 million debut, as audiences show little appetite for a story they already know.
Aaron Sorkin's sequel to The Social Network has opened to a muted $5 million at the North American box office, a fraction of the $22 million its predecessor took in 2010 and a sobering result for a film that Sony Pictures and Alcon Entertainment reportedly made for $30 million.
The Social Reckoning, which dramatises the Facebook whistleblower scandal between 2019 and 2021, arrived in 2,606 theatres on 9 October. Its opening fell below the $5.5 million estimate circulated on Sunday and represents less than a quarter of the debut enjoyed by David Fincher's original 16 years ago. The film holds a 55% critics score on Rotten Tomatoes and a B- CinemaScore, suggesting that neither reviewers nor early audiences have embraced it.
The weak start is notable because the project carried considerable commercial ambition. The Social Network went on to gross $225 million worldwide and won three Academy Awards, and Sony backed the follow-up with an all-star cast led by Mikey Madison, Jeremy Allen White and Jeremy Strong, plus a splashy marketing campaign. A modest opening would not normally be disastrous for a political drama built largely around tense conversations in suits, but the budget and promotional spend raised expectations well beyond that.
Some observers attribute the shortfall to the change behind the camera. Fincher directed the 2010 film; Sorkin, who wrote both, directed this one himself. Others point to a perceived disconnect between Jesse Eisenberg's portrayal of Mark Zuckerberg in the original and Strong's interpretation in the new film.
The underperformance also reflects a broader shift in culture, politics and audience taste. In 2010, a film about Facebook's origins was genuinely bold. Few outside the technology industry knew the story in detail, and the tale of a site launched from a Harvard dormitory in 2004 carried an almost mythological quality. The Social Network stripped that away and placed Zuckerberg in an unflattering spotlight for the first time.
Sixteen years on, Zuckerberg and Meta are ubiquitous. The Social Reckoning covers the period when Facebook product manager Frances Haugen gathered tens of thousands of internal documents and passed them to the Wall Street Journal, which published a series detailing how the company chased engagement while struggling to contain misinformation and harm to users. Haugen testified before a Senate subcommittee in October 2021, and Zuckerberg has been questioned by Congress repeatedly. Much of that ground has already been covered extensively in the mainstream press, most recently around a landmark child-safety case Meta settled with state attorneys general in August for up to $17.1 billion.
Facebook's cultural standing has also changed. In 2010 the platform still carried positive connotations, connecting people in unprecedented ways and representing a form of entrepreneurship that appeared to cost consumers and society little. Big Tech had not yet acquired the negative associations it holds today, and Facebook was a trendy platform beloved by more than 500 million users. That made the original film daring in its nuanced depiction of the enterprise and raised profound questions for audiences.
The tone has since shifted, partly because of the very events the new film dramatises. Meta's business practices and its hands-off approach to political content have made audiences more sceptical and less shocked when Zuckerberg is cast as a villain. Facebook is also no longer the fashionable topic it once was: the flagship app is now associated with older users, while TikTok and Instagram have eclipsed it among younger audiences. Those are the same platforms where the film's trailers went largely ignored.
Meta's other services, including WhatsApp and Messenger, remain widely used, but they have become fixtures of daily life rather than exciting revolutions. The Social Network tapped into the zeitgeist of its moment. Sixteen years later, the culture has moved on, and the box office suggests audiences feel they have heard this story before.
8
