Business 3 min read By Bethany Hadley
Legal Tourism Adds Growing Cost to Economy-Boosting M&A Deals
Rising fees for cross-border legal advice are acting as a mounting tax on mergers and acquisitions, according to analysis of the deal market, with insufficient bids ultimately exposed as just that.
Legal tourism — the practice of shopping for legal advice across jurisdictions — is emerging as a growing cost burden on mergers and acquisitions, a market that generates significant economic activity. The warning comes as dealmakers face mounting fees for cross-border legal counsel, with the expense increasingly weighing on transaction economics.
In the M&A space, money is rarely left on the table. Insufficient bids will ultimately be revealed as just that. The observation points to a market in which pricing discipline is unforgiving and where every added cost, including legal fees, can affect whether a deal proceeds or collapses.
The concern is not merely about the size of legal bills. Legal tourism implies that parties are seeking advice in multiple jurisdictions, potentially duplicating work and adding layers of cost to transactions that are already complex. For companies pursuing acquisitions, those costs can erode the value of a deal before it is even completed.
M&A is widely regarded as a driver of economic dynamism, allowing capital to move toward more productive uses and enabling businesses to scale, restructure or exit. Any friction that raises the cost of doing deals can therefore have consequences beyond the boardroom, affecting investment flows and the wider economy.
The phrase «legal tourism» suggests a market in which legal services are sourced internationally, perhaps to secure favourable treatment or specialist expertise. But the practice carries a price, and that price is increasingly being counted as a tax on transactions that would otherwise boost economic activity.
The analysis also carries a warning for bidders: a bid that is too low will not be rescued by clever legal structuring. In the end, the market reveals insufficient offers for what they are. That principle applies as much to the cost of advice as to the price paid for a target company.
For British businesses and their advisers, the issue is relevant at a time when cross-border dealmaking remains a central part of corporate strategy. Companies weighing acquisitions must factor in legal expenses that can vary widely depending on the jurisdictions involved and the complexity of the transaction.
The broader point is that friction in the deal market has a cost. Whether through legal fees, regulatory hurdles or advisory charges, every additional layer of expense reduces the incentive to transact. If legal tourism continues to grow, it may become a more visible drag on the M&A activity that economies rely on.
For now, the message is straightforward: in M&A, money is rarely left on the table, and insufficient bids will ultimately be revealed as just that. Legal costs are part of that calculation, and they are rising.
5
